ECUR 809 – Assignment #2
After
taking another look at the prenatal exercise program to promote physical fitness
as a way to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in urban First Nations
women, I have decided that Stufflebeam’s
CIPP model would be an appropriate method of evaluation for it. The Scriven
summative model did provide some tactics that would be beneficial to the study
of the program, such as the questionnaire that participants filled out to provide
their own feedback on the structure and implementation of the program, but I
think that the CIPP model is a more structured method that would allow for
goals and outcomes to be clarified from the start.
The
context evaluation in this program is
the need for finding a feasible way to decrease the onset of type 2 diabetes in
urban Aboriginal women. By defining this
goal clearly from the start, the decision makers in the program can use their
resources to find different opportunities to make the outcome a reality.
The
input evaluation is the way to
address the practical aspects of the program to determine how sustainable it
would be in the long run. Staffing and
facility usage are two pieces that would need to be budgeted for to determine
cost-effectiveness in the onset of the program.
I think that this is critical at the beginning stages of the program
because in the previous evaluation that I read, the program did not continue
due to lack of funds. If funding was
determined to prolong the program from the beginning, it would see greater
success.
The
process evaluation would be assessed
as women participated in the structured program, and records were maintained by
staff to study the effectiveness and success of different forms of physical
activities. Changes could be made to
scheduling conflicts and more time could be allotted for preferred
exercise. The final product evaluation would be determined after a group of women
participated in the program for a specific time. This is where I think the questionnaire would
still be beneficial. Feedback from
participants would help to determine what changes could be made for greater
success in meeting the targeted goals.
The
CIPP model provides a structured approach to evaluating the physical fitness
program that I think would be valuable since it clearly states goals, it helps
to address cost-effectiveness, and it determines practical aspects of making
the program feasible over the long term.
It also allows for changes to be made during the process, as well as
reflection when studying the final outcome.
Nicole I like that you have applied a different model to this evaluation. I agree that the structure is helpful in generating a deeper understanding of the program. You inform your decision based on the evaluation opportunities you see in the program and also use the previous evaluation. There will be instances in PE where you have the exact same situation. By pushing the boundaries you make a strong case for the CIPP model and outline a solid evaluation plan.
ReplyDeleteWell done.
Jay