ECUR 809 – Assignment One
A
program evaluation of a Prenatal Exercise Program for Urban Aboriginal Women
prepared by The Department of Medicine and The School of Physiotherapy at the
University of Saskatchewan.
In March 1995 a weekly fitness
program with incentives was developed as a side initiative that paralleled a
two year National Health Research and Development Program. The goal of the program was to promote
physical fitness as a way to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in
prenatal First Nations women. Over the
two year period, the program saw great success with the 69 participants in the
areas of improving fitness levels and raising self-esteem. Women who participated in the program
provided information for health-based questions, prenatal health information,
and basic demographic data upon registration.
The evaluation of the program was conducted to see whether or not it was
feasible to create and maintain such an exercise program for urban Aboriginal
women and it seems to follow the Scriven model
of evaluation.
The goals for the program were
clearly identified in the evaluation as optimizing healthy pregnancies in urban
Aboriginal women as a way to prevent type 2 diabetes in future
populations. Summative and formative
methods of collecting data were both used to provide a descriptive analysis of
the program. Formative feedback was
provided through field notes from program personnel such as: A Registered Nurse
Coordinator, Physiotherapist, Aboriginal Project Facilitator, and a certified
exercise instructor. Summative feedback
came from a questionnaire that 51% or participants completed near the end of
their pregnancy, or shortly after childbirth.
In the questionnaire that took about 15 minutes, participants were able
to provide their own feedback on:
Program structure, incentives, factors that determined attendance,
benefits of physical fitness, personal exercise behaviors, and “attitudes and
beliefs regarding exercise and sociodemographic information (optional)”. The chi-squared method of analysis was used
to create data that reflected the active participation of women in the program
and the success it had in promoting exercise and fitness. Women that took part also gave positive
statements about how the program was beneficial to their health and prenatal
wellness and also how it helped to motivate them for further exercise.
Limitations of the evaluation were
stated in the study. Although it was
beneficial to receive a “post-program” questionnaire, only half of the women
that participated were able to provide their feedback because the questionnaire
was only developed after the program was well underway. It would have been interesting to see how
responses to the questionnaire differed from telephone interviews to
self-administered answers which were the two methods of delivering the survey. Conversations over the phone could have made
an impact on responses because participants may have given answers they thought
the facilitator wanted to hear, as opposed to an anonymous response
questionnaire. Another weakness of the
evaluation is that information only came from those who attended and did not
include the 39% of women who inquired about the program and did not
attend. If the study could compare the
data to a standard instead of to the control group of participants, the results
could be more conclusive.
Reading through the evaluation of
this program allowed me to see how programs such as these could really benefit
the Aboriginal population in Saskatoon.
Physical fitness is so important to everyone’s health and providing a
demographic that is prone to GDM with a flexible, prenatal fitness program that
includes incentives such as healthy snacks and beverages, free childcare,
bus-tickets, and free information on health and diabetes prevention could only
work to help in the fight against type 2 diabetes. It is a shame that the program could not
continue due to the lack of resources and support.
Excellent choice of program Nicole. I agree that it is a summative model that seems to be implemented halfway through the evaluation. There were many opportunities to improve the overall design and application of evaluation in this particular case. What other strengths did you find in the evaluation?
ReplyDeleteJay